RELEVANCE: Poor
Relevance to question and module/course Does the submission provide a direct answer to the set question? Does the submission engage directly and in-depth with relevant themes from the module/course? Does the submission identify and incorporate relevant required reading material? Are the readings and/or examples used in the submission relevant to the question and the module/course?
POOR
WEAK
SATISFACTORY
GOOD TO VERY GOOD
EXCELLENT TO OUTSTANDING
STRUCTURE: Poor
Does the introduction directly answer the question, set out the argument, and lay out the steps that the submission will follow? Are the steps of the argument clearly signposted through the submission? Do the different parts of the submission fit well together? Is the submission coherent? Are ideas and/or examples laid out in a logical order, where one point builds toward the next – both at overall level and at paragraph level? Does the conclusion reflect on what was achieved successfully, on any limitations, and/or on ways forward?
POOR
WEAK
SATISFACTORY
GOOD TO VERY GOOD
EXCELLENT TO OUTSTANDING
ARGUMENTATION: Poor
Argumentation, reasoning and analysis Does the submission build a clear and convincing argument that responds directly to the question? Does the submission evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the material that it uses (rather than simply summarising or describing it)? Are claims well substantiated with reasons and/or evidence? Does the submission consider and respond well to counter-arguments?
POOR
WEAK
SATISFACTORY
GOOD TO VERY GOOD
EXCELLENT TO OUTSTANDING
SOURCES: Weak
Use of sources and referencing Does the submission identify and incorporate an appropriate range of high-quality scholarly sources relevant to the question? If appropriate, does the submission identify and incorporate relevant examples based on readings and/or research? Are all sources properly referenced? Are citations/footnotes and the bibliography presented in an error-free way, in an accepted referencing style?
POOR
WEAK
SATISFACTORY
GOOD TO VERY GOOD
EXCELLENT TO OUTSTANDING
WRITING: Poor
Presentation and writing Does the submission meet all presentation guidelines offered by the instructor and/or Department and/or School? For example: standard 12-point font such as Times New Roman or Calibri; 1.5-spaced or double-spaced; page numbers included; candidate number included; student name excluded; standard margins; consistent formatting throughout the submission. Is the submission clearly, comprehensibly and fluidly written? Is the submission free of spelling, grammatical and other stylistic errors?
POOR
WEAK
SATISFACTORY
GOOD TO VERY GOOD
EXCELLENT TO OUTSTANDING
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more
Recent Comments