LDR 3301 – Leadership Case-Study Assignment Instructions
This course covers several key theories and models of leadership, as well as the essential traits and competencies associated with effective leadership in the public sector and the ethical questions that arise when considering leadership in service of the public good. While seminal readings and traditional classroom instruction are a helpful means of introducing you to this material, one of the goals of this course is for you to apply these concepts in meaningful contexts and to see leadership in action through real-world examples. To that end, you will be working on a semester long project that will allow you to observe actual public leaders, identify and document their leadership styles, and apply the theories and concepts covered in this course to a case-study of real-world public leadership crafted from their professional experiences.
You will be given the remainder of this semester to work on the projects. Your instructor will be available throughout the semester to meet with you and discuss your projects. At a minimum, your group will be required to meet with the instructor twice throughout the semester to discuss your progress on the project. These meetings can be by phone, or via Microsoft Teams depending on what’s most convenient for your group.
Project Instructions
Each individual project will culminate in the submission of a 10-12 page (double-spaced)case study report that answers the questions and prompts provided below. Your case-study reports should be informed by thorough background research as well as interviews with your identified public leader, and when possible interviews with her or his subordinates and colleagues, organizational stakeholders, and direct observation of her or his leadership qualities. Some best practices for structuring and achieving such interactions will be discussed in class. Each project should cover the following four areas (which will be discussed in detail throughout the semester). Be careful to read the instructions for each section thoroughly before beginning your projects.
You may select leaders who work in the public domain as broadly defined by this course, including governmental organizations, transnational governing bodies, non-government institutions (i.e. nonprofit and community-based organizations), educational institutions, and public private partnerships.
Your group should discuss answers to the following questions when writing your narrative for this section:
Your group should discuss answers to the following questions when writing your narrative for this section:
Your group should discuss answers to the following questions when writing your narrative for this section:
Case Study Example: You should describe a specific challenge or crisis faced by the leader and provide an in-depth analysis of how the leader responded to the challenge. In doing so, your group should discuss answers to the following questions when writing your narrative for this section:
The section below provides a detailed grading rubric for the final report. Please only contact your leadership partners for questions related to the case-study portion of the project (i.e. interviews, observations, etc.). All questions about the project instructions, well as educational/academic questions, should be directed to the instructor.
PAD 3301 Case-Study Project – Grading Rubric | |||||
Category | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | Your score |
Leader Introduction
(Weight: 2x)
|
The paper identifies an appropriate public leader and provides a clear and thorough professional biography, as well as a clear delineation of his or her professional responsibilities. | The paper identifies an appropriate public leader and provides a sufficient professional biography, as well as a clear delineation of his or her professional responsibilities. | The paper identifies an appropriate public leader and provides a fair but incomplete professional biography, and or a fair but incomplete delineation of his or her professional responsibilities. | The paper fails to identify an appropriate public leader and/or fails to provide an acceptable professional biography and/or delineation of his or her professional responsibilities. | |
Leadership Responsibilities
(Weight 3x) |
Paper clearly & comprehensively identifies and defines the individual’s organizational, institutional and/or community leadership responsibilities, as well as the communities and stakeholders served by the leader. | Paper adequately identifies and defines the individual’s organizational, institutional and/or community leadership responsibilities, as well as the communities and stakeholders served by the leader. | Paper minimally identifies and defines the individual’s organizational, institutional and/or community leadership responsibilities, as well as the communities and stakeholders served by the leader. Some key elements of the description are missing and/or underdeveloped. | Paper fails to sufficiently identify and define the individual’s organizational, institutional and/or community leadership responsibilities, as well as the communities and stakeholders served by the leader. | |
Identification of Leadership Style/Attributes
(Weight 3x)
|
Paper clearly and comprehensively identifies the leadership style, competencies, and attributes exhibited by the leader.
|
Paper adequately identifies the leadership style, competencies, and attributes exhibited by the leader. | Paper minimally identifies the leadership style, competencies, and attributes exhibited by the leader. | Paper fails to sufficiently identify the leadership style, competencies, and attributes exhibited by the leader. | |
Case-Study Example
(Weight 3x) |
The paper provides an appropriate case-study example of a leadership challenge or crisis and clearly details the actions taken by the public leader and the ethical considerations inherent in the challenge.
|
The paper provides an appropriate case-study example of a leadership challenge or crisis and adequately details the actions taken by the public leader and the ethical considerations inherent in the challenge.
|
The paper provides an appropriate case-study example of a leadership challenge or crisis but incompletely details the actions taken by the public leader and /or the ethical considerations inherent in the challenge.
|
The paper fails to provide an appropriate case-study example of a leadership challenge or crisis and/or fails to sufficiently detail the actions taken by the public leader and/or the ethical considerations inherent in the challenge.
|
|
Quality of Evidence
(Weight 2x)
|
Paper contains only clearly documented evidence, including interview responses and background research. Evidence is relevant, logically presented, and properly documented. | Paper contains mostly clearly documented evidence, including interview responses and background research. Evidence is relevant, logically presented, and properly documented. | Paper contains some clearly documented evidence, including interview responses and background research. Some evidence is relevant, logically presented, and properly documented, but other instances are not. | Paper fails to present clearly documented evidence, such as interview responses and/or background research. Evidence presented is not relevant, logically presented, and/or properly documented. | |
Application of Course Material
(Weight: 3x)
|
Paper does an excellent job of connecting course material to the leadership profile and case-study. This includes making observation and/or evidence-based connections between the leader’s actions and the prevailing theories covered this semester. | Paper does an adequate job of connecting course material to the leadership profile and case-study. This includes making observation and/or evidence-based connections between the leader’s actions and the prevailing theories covered this semester. | Paper makes an effort to connect course material to the leadership profile and case-study, though is underdeveloped in some places. | Paper does not do an adequate job of connecting course material to the leadership profile and case-study. | |
Awareness of Public Service Ethics and Values
(Weight: 2x) |
The case-study report demonstrates excellent awareness of public service ethics and values, as they pertain to the case-study example.
|
The case-study report demonstrates adequate awareness of public service ethics and values, as they pertain to the case-study example. | The case-study report demonstrates some limited awareness of public service ethics and values, as they pertain to the case-study example.
|
The case-study report fails to demonstrate awareness of public service ethics and values, as they pertain to the case-study example.
|
|
Writing, Format, Mechanics, and Organization
(Weight: 2x)
|
Paper is excellently written and organized, and it is essentially error free in terms of grammar and mechanics. The writing flows smoothly from one idea to another. | Paper is well written and organized, and it is largely error free in terms of grammar and mechanics. The writing generally flows smoothly from one idea to another. | Paper is somewhat well written and organized, but it suffers from unnecessary errors in terms of grammar and mechanics. The writing generally flows smoothly from one idea to another. | Paper is not well written, and there are major errors in terms of grammar and mechanics. Writing does not generally flow from one idea to another. | |
TOTAL SCORE |
/100 |
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more
Recent Comments