Watch the film Invictus (2009)

Using class lectures, textbook readings, and online assignments apply examples from the film Invictus to
answer the two (2) questions presented below:
(1) Examine Nelson Mandela’s leadership in the movie to the leadership concepts discussed in the
textbook, class lectures, and online assignments.
(2) What results did Mr. Mandela achieve? Describe how he influenced and motivated others to support
his vision.
Cite all references used in your Paper
Papers are due October 17, 2022, by 11:45 pm.
Your Paper should be a maximum of two (2) pages, double-spaced in a Microsoft Word document.
Upload your Paper on the Turnitin link under WEEK 8.
The Paper is 10 points.
Late papers:
Turn in one day late and lose 2 points
Turn in two days late and lose 4 points
Turn in three days late and lose 6 points
No late papers are accepted after day three
GRADING RUBRIC
Students are graded on spelling, Grammar, integration of key course concepts, and the thoroughness of
responses to the questions posed in the case.
Content (application of concepts) = 7/10
Writing (spelling, grammar, syntax) = 3/10
WRITING (Punctuation, Grammar & Usage, Spelling)
1. (Poor/Unacceptable) = Errors are distracting and show a lack of understanding of
sentence-level Grammar or the basic conventions of edited American English.
2. (Fair-Good) = Grammar, punctuation, and spelling errors exist, but the point of each sentence is clearly
understood. Uses language concisely and eloquently. It flows well from one sentence to the next and
reads well aloud. The few errors there do not get in the way of reading fluently.
3. (Excellent) = Clearly written, well-organized, and free of Grammar and other language use errors.
CONTENT – QUESTIONS
1.(Fail) = Does not incorporate concepts from class and does not answer questions.
2. (Poor) = Describes but does not analyze using class concepts. Answered most questions, but answers
were based on their own opinions without reference to concepts from the class.
3. (Below Average) = Answers all the questions and mentioned concepts but does not adequately explain
how they were relevant to the question.
4. (Fair) = Answers all the questions and tries to integrate theory. Some details are there but are not
complete and may sometimes be inaccurate.
5. (Good) = Answers all questions, uses concepts appropriately, and explains how the concept is relevant.
Some details are there but are not complete and may sometimes be inaccurate. Examples and
illustrations are given but are not sufficient.
6 .(Very Good) = Completely and adequately answer all questions using appropriate concepts and
theories from in-class lectures and the text. Sufficient details and explanations are provided, and
examples are relevant. The understanding of the concepts is clearly demonstrated.
7. (Excellent) = Goes over and above to cover the content required. It details the concepts accurately and
connects them to the case questions. Points out things an average student may not even notice. Is
articulate and convincing in arguing each point. Anyone reading this would be eager to hire this individual
for a position in his or her organization.