Respond to at least two of your colleagues and offer alternative views on the impact of patient preferences on treatment plans or outcomes, or the potential impact of patient decision aids on situations like the one shared.

Learning Goal: I’m working on a nursing discussion question and need an explanation and answer to help me learn.

Respond to at least two of your colleagues and offer alternative views on the impact of patient preferences on treatment plans or outcomes, or the potential impact of patient decision aids on situations like the one shared.

1) Post by Zeinab H.

The practice in healthcare settings exposes individuals, especially providers, to individuals from different works of life. Healthcare providers meet people with diverse cultures, belief systems, and treatment practices or beliefs. As a nurse in charge of the cancer unit, I had a chance to interact with an Islamic woman diagnosed with breast cancer. Based on her right to the type of treatment preferred, she opted to have surgical removal of her breast to help in her treatment (Melynk & Fineout-Overholt, 2018). The procedure involves having a mastectomy involving the surgical reconstruction of the breast with a flap by applying abdominal tissue to a donor site. As a result, a foley catheter was utilized to assist in draining the urine and ensuring ongoing process of monitoring flap and surgical site for the purposes of ruling out the possible complications.

Based on the cultural practices and religious affiliation, she was uncomfortable being cared for by the male nurse. Therefore, she opted for the female nurse, and it was necessary to respect her wishes. Due to the cultural differences between the provider and the patient, it was necessary to assign the responsibility of caring for this patient to another female nurse as a sign of respecting cultural practices (Melynk & Fineout-Overholt, 2018). The post-surgical care and the ongoing treatments were to be under the assigned female nurse.

Personally, the decision to grant the client her wishes made it possible for successful treatment. No tension or stress was experienced during the recovery journey since she was offered care and treatment based on cultural competency as per her beliefs and cultural practices. Throughout the treatment, she remained calm and receptive to healthcare, which helped reduce her anxiety and remain focused on her healing process. The assigned nurse was informed about the developments to ensure assigned staff is female to avoid conflicts and poor cooperation from the patient.

The role of the decision aid chosen was one that applies to clients and healthcare services based on constancy with religious and cultural affiliation. Much attention was given to respecting her wishes in post-surgical care and treatment options. This included the consideration of her modesty, self-awareness, and reflection on the post-procedure (Kon et al., 2016). The decision was focused on evidence-based practice and shared decision-making to promote quality healthcare.

The decision aid inventory informs about the areas to focus on in different clinical circumstances. It is crucial to accept professional viewpoints and other substantial alternative that patients can select to ensure enhancement of the treatment process that eventually improves the overall prognosis with attention to the best healthcare services options available (Hoffman et al., 2014). As a provider, it is vital to adopt and implement evidence-based practice that considers patients’ values and preferences, rigorous research, and ethical expertise in making decisions resulting in improved healthcare outcomes for patients and families.

References

Hoffmann, T. C., Montori, V. M., & Del Mar, C. (2014). The connection between evidence-based medicine and shared decision making. Jama312(13), 1295-1296. doi:10.1001/jama.2014.10186

Kon, A. A., Davidson, J. E., Morrison, W., Danis, M., & White, D. B. (2016). Shared decision-making in intensive care units. Executive summary of the American College of Critical Care Medicine and American Thoracic Society policy statement. American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine193(12), 1334-1336. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201602-0269ED

Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2018). Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: A guide to best practice (4th ed.). Philadelphia,

2) Post by Court Dou

Patient Preferences and Decision Making

In healthcare, one of the most important parts of the care plan to promote the best possible patient outcomes is the inclusion of the patient in their decision making. In Hoffman et.al.’s 2014 journal article, it is outlined how the combination of evidence-based medicine, patient-centered communication skills, and shared decision-making lead to optimal patient care (Figure 1). I have been able to witness in my own practice how including patients in their healthcare decisions has a huge impact on their overall outcome.

Working in an inpatient mental health facility has really shown me the value of including patients in their decision making, though sometimes it proves to be challenging if the patient does not have much insight into the severity of their mental illness. I actually was able to see this firsthand more recently in my facility. We had a patient who had been at our facility for quite some time who is considered gravely disabled due to their mental health symptoms. When planning for what would be best for the patient, the provider had decided that the best place would be our state mental health hospital. When the client was told this, the patient began yelling and posturing aggressively towards staff though the patient had been nothing but pleasant for the month plus they had been at our facility. Immediately, we knew something was wrong. We sat down with the patient and asked them to share what they were feeling. The patient explained that they did not want to go to the state hospital because they had been there before and did not have a good experience. The patient continued to explain that they had gone to this facility during the prime of COVID and it felt like a prison, they were quarantined to their rooms and were not allowed to have visitors. This was a tricky situation because this client was gravely disabled and the state hospital was the best option for this patient to help manage their illness, but we did not want it to be not a therapeutic option if the client was this resistant of the facility. So, we called the state hospital to see what the status of their COVID restrictions were and found out that they are much less restrictive than the last time the patient was there. When the patient was told this, we were then able to slowly acclimate the patient to the idea of going to the state hospital once accepted off of their waitlist and made the transition much easier as the patient was eventually excited to go.

Many things were learned from this experience. By including the patient’s beliefs and values into the decision making regarding their cares, we were ultimately able to get the patient to be more open to going to the state hospital and will therefore have an overall better experience and outcomes at the state hospital if they are more willing to engage in their treatment. In Krist et.al.’s 2017 journal entry, it is described how including patients in decisions for their care will lead to better patient outcomes and more compliance (para. 7). The hope for the patient that I described is that because we included their feelings into the plan, they will be more willing to engage in the treatment at the state hospital that will be able to provide them with the necessary skills to manage their mental health symptoms outside of a facility setting.

Using The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute’s 2019 patient decision aids, I identified the Ottawa Personal Decision Guide as an tool that I both could’ve used in the situation described above as well is in my personal and professional practice. The tool allows for a person to identify options they have for themselves and the pros and cons of each. The tool also allows the person to identify the knowledge, the values, and the support the person has in this decision making. This tool will aid a person in making an informed decision for themselves in a way that allows them to feel like they are included in the decision making, even if ultimately it is not the one the thought they would have wanted but were able to weigh the pros and cons and eventually make an informed decision that is best suited for them or at least understand why a treatment team feels it is the best for them.

References

Hoffman, T.C., Montori, V.M., & Del Mar, C. (2014). The connection between evidence-based

medicine and shared decision making. Journal of the American Medical Association,

312(13), 1295-1296. doi:10,1001/jama2014.10186.

Krist, A. H., Tong, S. T., Aycock, R. A., & Longo, D. R. (2017). Engaging patients in decision-

making and behavior change to promote prevention. Studies in health technology and

informatics. Retrieved November 3, 2022, from

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6996004/

The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute. (2019). Patient decision aids. Retrieved from

https://decisionaid.ohri.ca/AZsearch.php?criteria=psych.

Learning Resources

REQUIRED READINGS

Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2018). Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: A guide to best practice (4th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer.

  • Chapter 7, “Patient Concerns, Choices and Clinical Judgement in Evidence-Based Practice” (pp. 219–232)

 

Hoffman, T. C., Montori, V. M., & Del Mar, C. (2014). The connection between evidence-based medicine and shared decision making. Journal of the American Medical Association, 312(13), 1295–1296. doi:10.1001/jama.2014.10186

 

Kon, A. A., Davidson, J. E., Morrison, W., Danis, M., & White, D. B. (2016). Shared decision making in intensive care units: An American College of Critical Care Medicine and American Thoracic Society policy statement. Critical Care Medicine, 44(1), 188–201. doi:10.1097/CCM.0000000000001396

 

Opperman, C., Liebig, D., Bowling, J., & Johnson, C. S., & Harper, M. (2016). Measuring return on investment for professional development activities: Implications for practice. Journal for Nurses in Professional Development, 32(4), 176–184. doi:10.1097/NND.0000000000000483

 

Schroy, P. C., Mylvaganam, S., & Davidson, P. (2014). Provider perspectives on the utility of a colorectal cancer screening decision aid for facilitating shared decision making. Health Expectations, 17(1), 27–35. doi:10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00730.x

The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute. (2019). Patient decision aids. Retrieved from https://decisionaid.ohri.ca/

OPTIONAL RESOURCES

Review these instructions for guidance on how to create a narrated PowerPoint presentation.
https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/office/record-…

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more
error: Content is protected !!