No Submission 0 points Presentation of Content 6 points

Teacher Candidate
5. Target 8 points
The role as a teacher candidate includes thorough and professional examples of how one embodies the College of
Education’s philosophy to learn, lead, and serve.
4. Acceptable 6.96 points
The role as a teacher candidate includes a detailed and relevant explanation of how one embodies the College of
Education’s philosophy to learn, lead, and serve.
3. Approaching 5.92 points
The role as a teacher candidate is unclear and lacking details of how one personifies the College of Education’s
philosophy to learn, lead, and serve.
2. Insufficient 5.52 points
The role as a teacher candidate is unfocused and missing key details of how one personifies the College of
Education’s philosophy to learn, lead, and serve.
1. No Submission 0 points
Not addressed.
Teaching Philosophy 8 points
Criteria Description
Teaching Philosophy
Collapse All
5. Target 8 points
The teaching philosophy includes a substantial and compelling explanation of how the philosophy has developed
and changed over time.
4. Acceptable 6.96 points
The teaching philosophy includes a detailed and relevant explanation of how the philosophy has developed and
changed over time.
3. Approaching 5.92 points
The explanation of the teaching philosophy is unclear and lacking details of how the philosophy has developed
and changed over time.
2. Insufficient 5.52 points
The explanation of the teaching philosophy includes examples that are poor or unrealistic in how the philosophy
has developed and changed over time.
1. No Submission 0 points
Not addressed.
Technology 6 points
Criteria Description
Technology
5. Target 6 points
Thoroughly explains how technology draws complex connections to learning opportunities for all students.
4. Acceptable 5.22 points
Directly explains how technology relates to learning opportunities for all students.
3. Approaching 4.44 points
Vaguely explains how technology relates to learning opportunities.
2. Insufficient 4.14 points
Explanation of how technology relates to learning opportunities is incomplete or unrelated.
1. No Submission 0 points
Not addressed.
Christian Worldview 8 points
Criteria Description
Christian Worldview
5. Target 8 points
Provides a thorough and professional insight of how the Christian worldview affects you as a teacher, the
classroom student, and the community.
4. Acceptable 6.96 points
Provides a concise and meaningful explanation of how the Christian worldview affects you as a teacher, the
classroom student, and the community.
3. Approaching 5.92 points
Provides a vague and unclear explanation of how the Christian worldview affects you as a teacher, the classroom
student, and the community.
2. Insufficient 5.52 points
Provides irrelevant or unrelated explanation of how the Christian worldview affects you as a teacher, the
classroom student, and the community.
1. No Submission 0 points
Presentation of Content 6 points
Criteria Description
Presentation of Content
5. Target 6 points
The video is clear and concise. Ideas universally progress and relate to each other. The project gives the audience
a clear sense of the main idea.
4. Acceptable 5.22 points
The video is a logical progression of ideas and supporting information exhibiting a unity, coherence, and
cohesiveness.
3. Approaching 4.44 points
The video is generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization, or in their relationships
to each other.
2. Insufficient 4.14 points
The video content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong sense of purpose. Includes
some persuasive information.
1. No Submission 0 points
Not addressed.
Format 4 points
Criteria Description
Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
5. Target 4 points
Presentation is visually appealing, makes maximum use of images and graphics, and is engaging without being
overly busy. Readability is clearly considered.
4. Acceptable 3.48 points
Presentation is visually appealing, makes use of images and graphics, and is engaging without being overly busy.
Readability is considered.
3. Approaching 2.96 points
Presentation is visually appealing, makes use of images and graphics. Lack of control with formatting is apparent
and readability is impacted.
2. Insufficient 2.76 points
Presentation is busy and lacks a uniform, clean appearance. Minimal graphics are used. Readability is negatively
impacted.
1. No Submission 0 points
Not addressed