Learning Goal: I’m working on a criminal justice case study and need an explanation and answer to help me learn.
My case: Sherbert v. Verner (1963)
need:
1. APA Case Brief
2.short summary separate to post on discussion board
3. I will be re-explaining this brief into video to upload as assignment request. I need details laid out to speak on (provided below)
When it is time to present a case on the discussion board, you’ll see it in the activities for that day in weekly handout. You will be scored on your presentation as a separate assignment. The instructions for that assignment are below.
When it is time to present a case on the discussion board, you’ll see it in the activities for that day in weekly handout. You will be scored on your presentation as a separate assignment. The instructions for that assignment are below.
The combination of your paragraph and your video should include about half of the following elements. After interacting with other participants, the other half of the elements should be present as well. That is, by the end of the discussion, you should have addressed all of them.
[1] Remember, the issues that come before the Supreme Court are questions of law, rather than factual questions. Refer back to earlier handouts and/or the textbook for help with this distinction.
The rubric below will be used to evaluate your performance.
Component | Proficient
(5 points) |
Competent
(4 points) |
Novice
(3 points) |
Does Not Meet Expectations |
On Topic | Competent, plus
incorporates correlations with course material. |
Addresses all required content. | Addresses some of required content but misses one or more aspects. | Posts do not address required content. |
Timeliness | Several postings early and throughout the discussion | All required postings and on time | All required postings but some not in time for others to read and respond | Some required postings are missing |
Stylistics | Few grammatical or stylistic errors | Several grammatical or stylistic errors | Grammatical or stylistic errors that interfere with content | Grammatical or stylistic errors that makes understanding difficult. |
Participation | Competent, plus
contributes to the learning community through engagement (such as elaborating on a particular point or providing an alternate opinion). |
Full of thought, insight and analysis. Asks a probing question or offers a suggestion. | Some analysis, but information is thin and commonplace | Provides rudimental and superficial analysis. |
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more
Recent Comments