Instructions:
Please do not submit this assessment brief with your work. |
ASSESSMENT COVER SHEET 2022-2023
Programme: B.Sc(Hons.) Health, Safety and Environmental Management
Module Title/Module Code: OM1076 / Introduction to Health and Safety
Student Name:
UCLan ID:
Assessment Title/ Number: Coursework 1 – Report
Date of Submission: 24 November 2022
Question/ Task | Max. Mark | Mark in Percentage |
Introduction and objective | 20 | |
Main body | 55 | |
Conclusion and recommendations | 15 | |
References | 10 | |
Total | 100 |
Date of Presentation: NA
I confirm that this piece of work which I have submitted is all my own work and that references and quotations from both primary and secondary sources have been fully identified and properly acknowledged. I am fully aware that plagiarism and collusion are academic offences.
I also confirm that I have not used translation services or translation software in the production of this assignment. Student’s signature: Date: |
|
Please note the following penalties for late submission: | |
Date of Submission | Maximum Mark |
1-5 working days late | 40% |
More than 5 working days late | 0% |
1st Marker | 2nd Marker* | UCLan Verification | External Examiner Initials |
Name: | Name: | Name: | Name: |
Date: | Date: | Date: | Date: |
* 2nd Marking on sample basis. Please note that all marks are provisional subject to confirmation by the Module Assessment Board of the University of Central Lancashire, UK.
Task (100 marks)
Shopping malls, which are numerous and provide many jobs, play an essential role in people’s everyday lives. You are required to write a 1500-words (+/- 10%) report on health and safety in the shopping centres. The report must detail the various occupational health and safety hazards that shopping mall employees face, and the safe working procedures used to manage these hazards.
The following sections ought to be included in the report:
Students are expected to conduct a reasonable level of research and submit their work; failure to do so shall result in the non-evaluation of the student’s coursework.
———————————————————————————————————–
Guidelines:
Academic Misconduct Definitions
Accepted Similarity Index
Penalties of Academic Misconduct
All instances or allegations of the use of unfair means within summative assessment will be investigated in line with the college UMEP policy. If an allegation is found to be proven, then the appropriate penalty will be implemented:
Marking Criteria
The course work will be assessed and graded based on the marking criteria given below
LEVEL FOUR | |
FIRST
(80-100%) |
Written work is directly relevant to the title. The student demonstrates exceptional knowledge and understanding which is thorough and shows ability to critically contextualise knowledge and apply it in a relevant way so as to sustain an argument. Presentation is crisp, uncluttered and highly sophisticated and in an appropriate format. |
FIRST
(70-79%) |
Written work is directly relevant to the title. The student demonstrates excellent knowledge and understanding which is thorough and shows ability to critically contextualise knowledge and apply it in a relevant way so as to sustain an argument. Presentation is crisp, uncluttered and sophisticated and in an appropriate format. |
UPPER SECOND
(60-69%) |
Written work is directly relevant to the title. The knowledge base is judged sound and relevant. The student demonstrates an understanding of concepts and of their inter-relationship, but conclusions are sometimes reached on the basis of insufficient factual material. Material is well presented and in an acceptable format. |
LOWER SECOND
(50-59%) |
Written work is relevant but (in lower ranges) reflects some conceptual confusion and a reliance on description as a substitute for analysis. Syntax and grammar sometimes unsound. Competent presentation and an acceptable format, although some deficiencies are apparent. |
THIRD
(40-49%) |
Some significant degree of irrelevance to the title is common. Basic understanding of a limited range of material and grasp of concepts is superficial. Written material lacks focus, and is prone to sweeping unsubstantiated assertion. Evidence of reading, but the student is unable to rise above description. Significant deficiencies in expression, format or bibliographical detail. |
COMPENSATABLE FAIL
(35-39%) |
At least one third of material presented is relevant but there may be limited reference to the question. A generally poor but compensatable answer with extensive errors and omissions, or a substantial answer on the general topic in which the specific, central question is misinterpreted or avoided, or a very good essay in note form. Presentation is poor and sometimes inarticulate. |
UNCOMPENSATABLE FAIL
(30-34%) |
At least one third of material presented is relevant but there may be limited reference to the question. A generally weak answer with extensive errors and omissions, or a quite substantial answer on the general topic in which the specific, central question is misinterpreted or avoided, or a good essay in note form. Presentation is poor and often inarticulate. |
FAIL
(20-29%) |
Less than one third of material presented is relevant. A very weak answer with extensive errors and omissions, or an insubstantial answer on the general topic in which the specific, central question is seriously misinterpreted or avoided, or a weak essay in note form. There is only partial understanding demonstrated. Presentation is poor, often inarticulate and sometimes incomprehensible |
FAIL
(10-19%) |
An exceptionally poor answer with extensive errors and omissions and only a hint of relevant knowledge, or a very weak essay in note form, or an answer that ignores the question to an extent that hardly any of the content can be construed as being relevant to the general topic of the question. Presentation is very poor, often inarticulate and incomprehensible. |
FAIL
(0-9%) |
Answer not attempted, or limited to only a few paragraphs, or of no relevance to the general topic of the question. Zero is reserved for failure to attempt an answer, or no, or late submission. |
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more
Recent Comments