Good afternoon, Can you assist me with these questions below? What is your chosen research methodology? Provide justification for why this research methodology is best suited to your study. Describe alternative research methodologies and explain why these would be less effective in helping you validate your hypotheses. The purpose of this quantitative correlational study is to assess the relationship between leadership style (transformational leadership, transactional leadership, and passive/avoidant), toxic leadership, and job satisfaction of employees. FYI, The MSQ is The Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire (MSQ) is designed to measure an employee’s satisfaction with his or her job. The MLQ Rater Form is composed of 45 items and was designed to assess how the leader’s superiors, peers, subordinates, and others perceive the leader’s leadership behaviors. The following research questions and hypotheses will be addressed in this study: RQ1: What is the most prevalent leadership style (transformational leadership, transactional leadership, passive/avoidant behaviors) in the work setting as measured by the MLQ, the level of toxic leadership (Self-Promotion, Abusive Supervision, Unpredictability, Narcissism, and Authoritarian Leadership) as measured by the TLC, and the level of job satisfaction in the workplace as measured by the MSQ? RQ2: Is there a significant relationship between perceived leadership style (transformational leadership, transactional leadership, passive/avoidant behaviors) and toxic leadership (Self-Promotion, Abusive Supervision, Unpredictability, Narcissism, and Authoritarian Leadership)? H02: There is no significant relationship between perceived leadership style (transformational leadership, transactional leadership, passive/avoidant behaviors) and toxic leadership (Self-Promotion, Abusive Supervision, Unpredictability, Narcissism, and Authoritarian Leadership). H12: There is a significant relationship between perceived leadership style (transformational leadership, transactional leadership, passive/avoidant behaviors) and toxic leadership (Self-Promotion, Abusive Supervision, Unpredictability, Narcissism, and Authoritarian Leadership). RQ3: To what extent, if any, do perceive leadership styles (transformational leadership, transactional leadership, passive/avoidant behaviors, and toxic leadership (Self-Promotion, Abusive Supervision, Unpredictability, Narcissism, and Authoritarian Leadership), significantly predict employee job satisfaction? H03: Perceived leadership style (transformational leadership, transactional leadership, passive/avoidant behaviors, and toxic leadership (Self-Promotion, Abusive Supervision, Unpredictability, Narcissism, and Authoritarian Leadership), do not significantly predict employee job satisfaction. H13: Perceived leadership style (transformational leadership, transactional leadership, passive/avoidant behaviors, and toxic leadership (Self-Promotion, Abusive Supervision, Unpredictability, Narcissism, and Authoritarian Leadership), significantly predict employee job satisfaction.

Review the Case of Jerry and Case of Sal.

Conduct an Internet search for the Static 99 assessment.

The Case of Sal

Sal is a 20-year-old man currently in prison for molesting his 4-year-old cousin, Maria. Sal, who was living with Maria’s family and was often responsible for babysitting her, had been molesting Maria for 6 months. Sal initially enticed Maria through playing a game. When she would lose, he would tell her she could either allow him to touch her, or he would tell her mom she had lost the game and she would get in trouble. Sal also told Maria she needed to keep their game a secret, because he did not want her to get in trouble. Maria broke down in preschool and told her teacher about the incidents of molestation. The teacher immediately called the police, and Sal was arrested.

Sal tried to minimize the situation and his offense by stating “it was only touching.” He also tried to justify the offense by stating Maria enjoyed the game they played. Sal is currently undergoing psychological rehabilitation treatment at the prison.

The Case of Jerry

Jerry is a 53-year-old man scheduled to be released from prison in 2 weeks. He served a 20-year sentence for the rape of a 12-year-old girl. In his initial intake interview, Jerry admitted to being sexually attracted to young girls. He stated he had difficulty controlling his urges, which led to the crime he committed. Jerry has received counseling while in prison, but will still need to undergo treatment when he is released.

Determine the selected offender’s level of risk based on his assessment results.

Write a 1,050- to 1,400-word paper discussing treatment options for the selected offender.

Include the following:

• Summarize the case scenario you chose.
• Summarize the results of the Static 99 assessment for the offender in the case scenario you chose.
• Describe appropriate treatment options based on the sex offender’s risk level. Explain the primary cognitive-behavioral components associated with those treatment options.
• Describe the recidivism rates for offenders who have committed crimes similar to this offender.
• Describe the treatments that have helped reduce recidivism.

Include a minimum 3 outside sources.

Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines.