Explain how the Supreme Court decisions District of Columbia v. Heller and McDonald v. Chicago in on the Second Amendment rest upon its constitutional interpretation of individual Liberty

The SECOND Amendment: The Right to BEAR ARMS [AP Gov Review Unit 3 Topic 5 (3.5)]

What Does the Second Amendment REALLY Mean? | US v. Miller

Strengthening the Second Amendment | D.C. v. Heller

District of Columbia v. Heller [SCOTUSbrief]

District of Columbia v. Heller Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained

McDonald v. City of Chicago, Illinois [SCOTUSbrief]

McDonald v. Chicago, EXPLAINED [AP Gov Required Supreme Court Cases]

McDonald v. City of Chicago Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained

McDonald v. Chicago | Homework Help from the Bill of Rights Institute

Explain how the Supreme Court decisions District of Columbia v. Heller and McDonald v. Chicago in on the Second Amendment rest upon its constitutional interpretation of individual Liberty

Use the information in the analysis above (article and footnotes are linked for reference) and videos to discuss how the 2nd Amendment is a protected individual right. (offer arguments made by the court.)

Did the Court extend the right to all arms? Who does the Supreme Court intend to decide the future fate of gun possession?

“The Court also noted that there was a historical tradition of prohibiting the carrying of dangerous and unusual weapons that would not be affected by its decision.19Links to an external site. The Court, however, declined to establish the standard by which future gun regulations would be evaluated.20Links to an external site. “