-1 Final Project Submission: Executive Summary Presentation with Speaker Notes

Instructions

Submit your final presentation. The power point should be 10 to 12 slides in length, and should represent a compilation of your learning, incorporating, and showcasing your DMAIC process for your selected case study.

For the final project in this course, you will develop an executive summary presentation with speaker notes. Imagine that you are a human resource professional in an organization that is struggling with a conflict regarding a critical strategic project. Leaders in the organization are looking to you to assess the conflict, determine what the key issues are, and recommend an action plan to resolve it.

In this project, you will use organizational tools associated with the define, measure, analyze, improve, and control (DMAIC) process, a Six Sigma problem-solving methodology that many organizations use to solve a variety of issues. By following the rudimentary elements of the DMAIC process, you will define the problem, measure its impact on the organization, analyze the issue to assess how best to resolve it, develop recommendations to improve the situation (propose a solution), and suggest an ongoing process to ensure the proposed solution controls the issue, preventing a flare-up or reoccurrence of the original issue.

In this assignment, you will demonstrate your mastery of the following course outcomes:

· Analyze conflicts involving organizational culture for determining the root causes of dissonance between organizational values and the individual values of its members

· Propose data-driven processes that determine critical variables present in conflicts between employees for addressing organizational conflict situations

· Develop evidence-based strategies for addressing future conflicts involving organizational culture

· Assess the effectiveness of organizational leadership for informing organizational leaders on how to increase employee engagement, foster collaboration, and build effective teams

· Develop appropriate gap-analysis strategies for assessing the congruence of ethical, moral, and legal variables present in conflict situations between employees and organizational values

Prompt For your project, you will choose one of the case studies provided—Final Project Case Study

(ATTACHED) and develop an executive summary presentation with speaker notes and citations based on the case study. In your presentation, you will analyze the case study, determine the cause of the conflict, recommend corrective actions to resolve the conflict, and make recommendations to avoid similar conflicts in the future.

Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:

I. Defining Goals: In this section, you will summarize the desired resolution to the conflict in the case study based on your knowledge of the organization’s business goals, customer needs, and the process that needs to improve.

A. Construct a problem statement that clearly articulates the personnel conflict that has arisen. Be sure to consider the project scope and future state goal in contextualizing the conflict.

B. Complete a stakeholder analysis, identifying the key stakeholders that are involved in or affected by the current situation and future-state goal as articulated in the problem statement.

C. Develop a high-level suppliers, inputs, process, outputs, and customers (SIPOC) process map, identifying the quantitative and qualitative variables that are likely to contribute to the conflict.

II. Measuring Performance: In this section, you will create a process to gather data on the current situation.

A. Propose a process to effectively collect data on the identified variables (from the SIPOC analysis) and appropriately evaluate it.

B. Construct an Ishikawa diagram (fishbone diagram) of the variables that contribute to the conflict, selecting the critical variables that require further analysis.

C. Describe the role of these critical variables in developing corrective changes to address the conflict in the problem statement.

III. Analysis: In this section, you will begin to create a picture of what the future state will look like, focusing on the proposed solution.

A. Determine the root causes of the conflict by assessing the variables you identified, and the information provided in the case study.

B. Construct questions you would ask of the stakeholders (voice of customer) if this were a live situation to pressure test your initial assessment of the probable root causes.

C. Using the “Five Whys” process, construct additional questions you anticipate needing to ask as stakeholders answer your initial question.

IV. Improve: The goal of this section is to demonstrate that the solutions you propose should resolve the organizational conflict in the case study, leading to an improved future state.

A. Recommend appropriate corrective actions to address the previously determined root causes of the conflict.

B. Propose quantifiable metrics that could measure progress in implementing the recommended corrective actions.

C. Identify potential areas of resistance to the recommended corrective actions, providing recommendations to reduce such resistance.

D. Assess the effectiveness of various leadership styles on employee engagement and employee empowerment in the case study.

E. Determine how an effective team-building process could have prevented some of the issues with the dysfunctional team in the case study. You might consider team-building models like Drexler/Sibbet or Tuckman.

F. Recommend effective leadership styles and team-building processes that organizational leadership could use to promote increased employee engagement and foster collaboration moving forward.

V. Controls: This section will recommend methods that should help ensure the proposed solution resolves the defined problem now and in the future.

A. Describe how you would address ethical, cultural, and legal variables that present challenges when working with team members from different backgrounds and different geographic regions. Support your response with relevant examples.

B. Explain how organizational values can be identified, validated, and codified to reduce the potential for organizational dissonance.

C. Develop an appropriate gap-analysis strategy to periodically assess the congruence, or lack thereof, between an organization’s espoused values and its enacted values. Be sure to consider the ethical, cultural, and legal variables in the development of your gap-analysis strategy.